Green Zone

During the 2003 U.S. led occupation of Baghdad, a small unit of Army inspectors led by Chief Warrant Officer Roy Miller is tasked with locating weapons of mass destruction supposedly buried in the Iraqi desert. The team moves from one suspicious site to another, wading through booby traps and harsh conditions as they search for signs of chemical threats. The team faces a barrage of misleading information and political pressure that complicates their task. What began as a straightforward mission becomes a test of trust as discrepancies and conflicting accounts emerge from observers higher up. The burden to deliver concrete proof clashes with the lived reality on the ground, forcing Miller and his team to question the mission's purpose. Their methods are questioned, lines blur, and the cost of truth becomes a constant companion.

Directed by Paul Greengrass and released in 2010, Green Zone is based on Rajiv Chandrasekaran's account of the occupation with a screenplay by Brian Helgeland, blending frontline inspection drama with a tense political thriller.

Box office figures are not provided in the data you supplied, so I can’t quote the worldwide gross or domestic earnings. The entry focuses on production choices and critical reception rather than commercial performance and aims to inform the reader.

Green Zone stands out for Greengrass's kinetic handheld camera work, a documentary feel, and a blunt look at how war reporting and government rhetoric shape what soldiers believe. The film's sharp pacing and stark realism contributed to conversations about accountability in modern wartime narratives.

Critics gave a mixed reception, praising Damon for his restrained performance and Greengrass's relentless tempo, while some felt the film glossed over deeper complexities of the war. The themes center on misinformation, the friction between field data and official assurances, and the moral cost of decisions under pressure.